- This ruling determines –
- Whether or not the investee is a “controlled group company” and that the shares purchased by the Applicant and Co-Investor is “equity shares”; and
- The meaning of “hotel keeper” and the allowances that a hotel keeper may claim.
- The Applicant and Co-Investor intends to invest in qualifying companies that will carry on the business of hotel keepers. They will each appoint a company (manager) to operate and manage their respective hotels. The manager will guarantee certain profit targets per annum.
- The Applicant intends to exit this investment on or before the 5th year of the investment. The Co-Applicants will sell their respective hotels and distribute the proceeds to their shareholders.
- The ruling held that each share of the Co-Applicants will constitute an “equity share” and therefore a “qualifying share” and that neither of the Co-Applicants will constitute a “controlled group company” for so long as they do not hold more than 70% of the total equity shares, irrespective of the fact that the Applicant may invest more than 70% of the aggregate share capital in each of the Co-Applicants in monetary terms.
- The Applicant and Co-Investor can then get a deduction for the funds invested in the Co-Applicants in terms of the venture capital company regime.
Read More
http://www.taxdisputeresolution.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/News-Icon.gif
100
100
Rina Fourie
http://www.taxdisputeresolution.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Tax-Dispute-Resolution-3-300x138.jpg
Rina Fourie2016-07-22 09:04:442016-07-28 09:06:31BPR 242: Venture Capital Company Investment in Qualifying Companies
D v Commissioner, SARS (VAT 1390):
Guide on the Determination of Medical Tax Credits (Issue 7)
Scroll to top